Genesis 2:18: And the Lord God said, “It is not good that man should be alone; I will make him a helper comparable to him.”
Semantics can be a challenging study. Two words can often mean the same thing, such as in the words house and residence. Other times, the same word can have multiple meanings, as in the term cool, which can mean “fairly cold” or “fashionable” or even “unfriendly.” Ah, the fun of teaching the English language!
But, in the realm of biblical discourse, precision in our semantics is crucial. Differences in definitions can separate the closest of friends, even leading to the charge of “heretic.”
Recently, there has been a tempest in a teapot over the KJV term “helpmeet.” In my opinion (and you know I have one) the main source of steam in this tempest is actually a red herring – a diversion or distraction from the true objective. We will get into why I believe this to be a red herring in a few minutes, but first let’s discuss the term “helpmeet.”
“Helpmeet” is an Old English version of the more modern, yet often despised, word “helpmate.” Genesis 2:18, in the King James Version of the Bible, says, “And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.” Note – the words help and meet are not one, but two words. This particular combination of words is used only here – at Creation. Let’s look at the definition of the terms.
The first word, ezer in Hebrew, means helper. Yep, that’s it. It means helper.
And guess what, this term (and its root and derivatives) is used around 80 times in the Old Testament. It is even used as a word to describe God Himself. Psalm 33:20 describes God as “our help and our shield.” Psalm 70:5 calls Him our “help and our deliverer.” “Our help comes from the Lord, Who made heaven and earth” (Psalm 121:1-2). “Happy is he that hath the God of Jacob for his help…” (Psalm 146:5).
When referring to God as a helper to man, I am obviously not implying that the God of the universe is man’s assistant—or second in command. I am referring to the fact that man is lacking something that only God can supply. “God is our refuge and strength, a very present help in trouble.” (Psalm 46:1) God’s people can cry out to God: “Give us help from trouble: for vain is the help of man. Through God we shall do valiantly: for he it is that shall tread down our enemies.” (Psalm 60:11-12)
There are lots of helpers in our lives. And, if we were speaking OT Hebrew, we would use the term ezer (or one of its related words) to describe some of these helpers, depending on the context.
I remember many a time when Caleb (my 11-year-old son) was younger, he would come along to “help” me while I was engaged in some wood working project. Little hammer in hand, he would try to drive nails alongside me. Of course, when he was younger, he was not the best of “ezers,” so I would end up driving the nails myself. But, his heart was certainly in the right place. He wanted to help and serve his father. And my responsibility (Eph 6:4) was to allow him to help me – and at the same time train him to learn to be used of his Heavenly Father.
Reflecting on our text in Genesis, God looks at Adam and sees that it is not good for him to be alone. Adam has areas of lack—areas of inadequacy. So, God declares that He will make for him a helper. Here is the exciting part – God makes the perfect helper for Adam – one “meet” or “comparable” to him.
This leads us to the second word – meet. This can be translated “counterpart.” This term helps us see there is a special helper for Adam, unlike any other on earth (Genesis 2:20). This is a descriptive term that defines a special role. This particular helper would correspond to Adam, filling his need—giving him balance and stability. The resulting “one flesh” union is a complementary relationship. Adam had areas of weakness – Eve had areas of strength. Where Eve was weak, Adam proved strong. Ah, the wonder and mystery of Christian marriage!
So, here’s the deal. If a child wants to be my “ezer,” my helper, do I complain? Of course not! I want to have the opportunity to teach my Caleb to use a hammer! He will be a man someday and will need that skill. Now, when my daughter tells me she wants to be my “ezer,” my helper—seeking to assist me in my ministry, am I troubled with this? Of course not. And neither is most of the Christian world. Especially in light of the fact that she will be a helper to her future husband! But so much more than just a helper. My daughter, Lord willing, will be a biblical help meet to her own husband someday!
But, here’s the rub. Say my daughter is an adult daughter who has made the decision to stay home until marriage, following examples outlined in Scripture. Is this fine with me? Of course! But not so with some in the Christian world. There are those who would say that such a decision is unnatural, outdated, ill-advised, a waste of time, even though there is a biblical case to be made for the decision.
And in swims the red herring. Since there is a biblical case to be made for this decision, those in opposition may look for an angle – a diversion. And such, sadly, has happened.
In their joy to say, “We are our daddy’s helpers!” some well meaning young ladies have used the incorrect term “helpmeet” rather than helper [editorial clarification - I am not inferring the authors of So Much More made this error - I have not seen this in my reading of their book - I also encourage you to read my 10/6 comment below as it provides additional insight to this issue].
“Aha!” cry the opponents. “Here are the false teachers! They are using the wrong word! Out with the baby! Out with the bathwater!” (For an interesting perspective, read Psalm 35, especially verses 19-21)
Suddenly, innocent gatherings such as father-daughter teas are lampooned. Daughters who symbolically give their father’s their hearts to guard until marriage are ridiculed (though I find it odd that “Promise Rings” are ok). Oh, and the fathers are castigated. We live in a sad day when a father and daughter cannot share paternal love—for even some who claim Christ roll their eyes.
So, what is the problem? The decision to stay at home until marriage? The conviction to serve one’s family? The audacity to teach this as something found in God’s Word? Yes, this is their problem. But it is hard to assault since the Bible speaks of these things. So – attack the term – a term unfortunately misused by a few well-meaning daughters. And then say this great heresy was in the heart of the authors all the time. It is as if some sinister plot is afoot!
And, when young ladies learn their error and correct their statements, or when others provide statements endorsing the correct usage of the terms, are their words met with grace? No. Some of those who stand against the practice of daughters remaining at home insinuate diabolical motives, calling into question the veracity of these clear statements. And they call this Berean? So much for living in unity.
Well, time to close. I have my true “helper comparable to me,” Stacy, and a couple of “ezers,” (daughters), calling me to the dinner table.
I am constantly amazed at what Christians will do battle over. As soon as your post was written, women began anew their fight against the word “helpmeet” and against daughters and their desire to be helpers of their fathers.
If you had posted about a works based theology, that Christ was married while here on earth or that He never actually rose from the dead, then yes! All those who read your words would have reason to post diatribes against them!
But you are writing about daughters, and their hearts desire to serve their father and mother through their love and faith in the Lord Jesus, to be a helper to their father. This is not a salvation issue, and it never will be! Let our fight be against that which will truly harm the Church, not over those things that edify and bring us closer in our walk with Him!
Thanks again for a well written, succinct answer.
Trish
1 Timothy 6: 3-5
If anyone advocates a different doctrine and does not agree with sound words, those of our Lord Jesus Christ, and with the doctrine conforming to godliness, he is conceited and understands nothing; but he has a morbid interest in controversial questions and disputes about words, out of which arise envy, strife, abusive language, evil suspicions, and constant friction between men of depraved mind and deprived of the truth, who suppose that godliness is a means of gain.
By: Trish on October 4, 2007
at 12:03 pm
Beautifully written.Thank God Jesus found me before some cult did.I am still amazed at my intense desire to follow godly sounding men.I have seen and heard you, and your wife teach and I have seen your “fruit”. You are the real thing. Your family is the real thing. I so appreciate that. My own wonderful husband has been fruit bearing all of our life together. I follow him. I trust him. I am his help meet, raising 3 “ezers’ and 2 “warrior” Princes.Thank you for blessing our family with your life,marriage and rubber-meets-the-road wisdom.We appreciate you.
By: Kellie on October 5, 2007
at 10:35 pm
Thank you Kellie. I appreciate your note. Praise the Lord – He is the real thing. It is He who gives us the strength to carry on. It is He who gives us eyes to see. He helps us to know the wisdom of God as opposed to the wisdom of man.
May the Lord bless your family for generations to come.
By: James McDonald on October 5, 2007
at 10:42 pm
Interestingly, those who support the Botkins defend them by saying that they are young and there are bound to be some mistakes and theological misunderstandings because of their age…yet their book is being held up to young girls to model their lives on. I don’t think you can have this both ways.
By: mary on October 6, 2007
at 9:11 pm
Hello Mary,
Welcome to my blog. And thanks for your comment.
From what you have written, I am not sure if you have read my article or not. I don’t see where I have made any statement about the Botkin girls’ age. Could you point me to this in the article? Also, I never referenced any theological mistakes in their work. Perhaps I am missing something?
You said…
I don’t see where I have said this at all. You seem to be painting with a pretty broad brush.
In my article, I specifically addressed the incorrect use of a term (not by the Botkins) and how some are using this to discount the whole book. You can read the Botkin’s own words on this topic in my article The Blessing of Daughters.
But please remember, just because one misuses a term does not mean one misunderstands an application. Have you ever heard about the time President Kennedy called himself a jelly-filled donut? I am sure his intent and application were correct, even if his diction was a bit confused.
I have read a ton of books in my day – it comes with my calling. And, in the process, I have found many a mistake. I found an editorial mistake in the book Easy Chairs, Hard Words recently. But I still heartily recommend this book to those new to the doctrines of grace. How about GI Williamson’s Commentary on the Shorter Catechism? I not only found an editorial mistake, but I don’t agree with every position he took when the book was penned. But, guess what, I still believe it is one of the most concise and complete works on the subject a layman can find.
Likewise, I recommend So Much More because of the principles it espouses, not because it is flawless.
So, is there any “baby in the bathwater” for you in So Much More?
By: James McDonald on October 6, 2007
at 11:11 pm
As I’ve been following these topics on the “biblical model” of how our daughters should lead their lives, a few things cross my mind.
Above someone state: “Let our fight be against that which will truly harm the Church, not over those things that edify and bring us closer in our walk with Him!” Yet isn’t this exactly what is happening every time another post is added in defense of this? We say we shouldn’t be arguing over the issue, but yet that’s what I see.
Lastly, I keep hearing how this is the biblical model yet I don’t see many scriptures to go along with it. In Mr. McDonald’s post on this subject, he educates us as to the term of helpmeet and then proceeds to explain how it is good to help. Yet no other biblical references to how this is the biblical model. That’s really part of the issue here. It comes as across as THE BIBLICAL MODEL. You (those holding a view similar to that in Return of the Daughter) may say that isn’t your position, but it certainly comes across as such.
I will add that I have not read So Much More and I suppose they may have scripture references.
Sonja
By: Sonja on October 10, 2007
at 11:56 pm
Hello Sonja,
Welcome to my blog! I appreciate your comments, and pray I am able to help, at least that is my goal.
In answer to your first question, I don’t see any hostility here. This blog exists to promote family reformation. I define this effort in a special page above. Is there something I am missing?
You mention, “in defense of this.” This blog is not meant to be defensive at all. I pray this blog helps confront a troubled, godless culture – I want to be on the offensive! The post above was written in an attempt to clarify misunderstandings on the compound term, “help meet.” I have heard it has helped, at least in some circles.
As to “the” biblical model. I have not seen this phrase promoted here. If you read my blog, you will see the phrase “a” biblical model And I certainly support and promote what I consider the “best” way to live. But, last time I checked, most pastors do this. At least pastors with real convictions.
I certainly believe many Christians live in the midst of compromise and confusion. I know I have lived this way in the past. And, as the Apostle Paul said in Philippians 3:12, I am sure I have not “attained.” But, those things the Lord has shown me will certainly be positions I promote here.
As to biblical support for anything herein, have you read through this blog? You mention not having read So Much More. Have you read Raising Maidens of Virtue? Have you read The Excellent Wife? I could go on, but I am sure you see my point. Reading is a great thing – and it should start with the Word of God.
If you have any specific questions regarding the Botkin family of the book So Much More, you might want to consider submitting a question to them. Stacy (my help meet) is getting ready to do an interview with them. She is collecting questions right now! So far, she has not received many “deep” questions. She is looking for some good ones!
Also, if, after reading the Family Reformation page, you have questions or need further biblical support, let me know.
Peace,
By: James McDonald on October 11, 2007
at 1:46 am
Thank you Elder McDonald for this clarification on the “help meet” vs. “helpmeet” confusion. I find this article especially helpful as I am going to be a new father and hopefully at some point a father to daughters.
While I have held the conviction that unmarried daughters are best served and serve best by staying at home until that blessed day when their “Isaac” comes and takes them as his helpmeet, I have often thought of various ways that that should work out in the everyday life relationship between a father and a daughter. Your article has shed some light into what that looks like for a Pastor called to the ministry of teaching and preaching and while my calling is similar but not quite the same I can see how my daughters could aid me in that calling.
Thank you and May Gods hand be upon your future ministry.
His Servant in His Service,
John Creath III
By: John Creath on October 12, 2007
at 4:31 pm
Mr. McDonald:
I wanted to thank you for your kind post and directing me to your family reformation page. I didn’t want you to think that I was just some mad blogger since I hadn’t responded. I agree with most things you had to say.
I didn’t mean to suggest that you specifically had said that it was “the biblical model”. Nor have I heard anyone suggest it in such words.
While I agree with much of what you have to say, I fear that the bigger picture of Christ and His atoning sacrifice gets a little lost. I know that I, personally, have found myself too wrapped up in these conversations about feminism, etc. that I find it detracting from the real reason I’m a Christian…..because Jesus loved me first, while I was unclean and even when I’m still “unclean” (spiritually, physically, my home, etc.) and that there are a whole lot of people out there that are lost. So, I will be spending less time focusing on what feminism has done to this world and live my life the way God leads us. I praise the Lord that He has given me a grounded, God-fearing husband. Thanks again for your time.
I’m sure you are an encouragement to many families. I only pray that it doesn’t become a stumbling block and source of pride amongst them. Peace be to you and your family as you continue to serve Him.
Sonja
By: Sonja on October 15, 2007
at 2:04 am
Hi again Sonja,
I am glad you had time to read through our charter.
We just got home from a trip out of town and are very tired, but I wanted to let you know I believe families living out the faith will be used of God to reach the lost. They will not be forgotten, they will be a focus.
When a husband loves his wife as Christ loves the church, when a wife honors her husband as the church should Christ, when children proceed from the one flesh union and walk in faith, the world sees. This is the gospel in action. And it leads to a shared faith and salvation.
I pray this makes sense.
Blessings to your home,
By: James McDonald on October 16, 2007
at 4:28 am
here is my biggest hurdle when talking to someone about this ( as I did today-and did not do well….blah…)
so, maybe you can help me as a mother of a 4yr.daughter.
First, I don’t believe in MAKING her stay home. I want this to come from her heart.
How do I prepare her to take care of herself should she not be courted?? What if she lives with us until we die (she’d be in her 40’s and we’d be in our 70’s/80’s) or if we were to be taken suddenly together to the Lord while she’s still maybe early 20’s?? I am not being anxious–I want to know that she can take care of herself if she NEEDS to. What skills should I make sure she has so that she can afford to eat without relying on us and without becoming a “career woman”.
If she could bake– could she make a living making bread for others? – Maybe she could!! it’s a lost art! even I don’t know how to do that!–guess it’s time to learn!!
Have you discussed these things with your daughters? have you given them encouragement to use what they have learned to do at home as a means of survival if they should need it?
I am in no way against my daughter staying home with us ( if she wants), but I just need to know how to simultaneaously prepare her for being on her own, in case that happens before we are ready for it.
By: Jenny on May 15, 2008
at 10:06 pm
Dear James,
I stumbled upon your blog and have loved reading comments and encouragements regarding my role as a help meet/mate to my husband. It is something I have struggled with all of our marriage.
Now that we have young adult daughters (18 & 20) who are considering their future, I’d love to hear your response to Jenny above from May 15, 2008. And her daughter is only 4yo!=)
I wholeheartedly agree we parents must raise our daughters to be helpers to their husbands. And yet in this day, it is helpful to have a marketable skill, ideally one that she can use to further her home. Any comments?
By: Cheryl Hatfield on September 3, 2008
at 9:22 pm
Hi Cheryl (and Jenny),
First, I am sorry for the delay in getting to this! Sometimes comments slip through unnoticed – or perhaps forgotten.
Anyway, there is absolutely nothing wrong with investing in a daughter’s education. I would say that parents who do not do so are the ones in the wrong. In Jesus’ parable of the talents, the sinful servant was the one who did nothing with the talents. What about the sinful father gifted with talented daughters?
There are many ways a parent could direct the education of a daughter. It might be in domestic skills such as sewing (my daughter Tiffany has her own sewing business). Or perhaps music. Maybe writing. Nursing? Midwifery?
The sky is the limit.
In a nutshell, we should invest in our daughters. It can help prepare them to be better helpmeets!
Blessings,
By: James McDonald on September 4, 2008
at 10:15 pm
Dear James,
Thank you for your encouragement. I hadn’t thought of Jesus’ parable of the talents in relation to talented daughters.
Just for the encouragement of other mothers (Jenny?), our oldest daughter is studying early childhood & elementary education. Kind of ironic since she was homeschooled most of her years. However, God gave her some incredible opportunities in her teens that revealed a gift of teaching. We often discuss how God might use her in many venues – the Church, Spanish ministries, ESL, children’s ministries, ministering within a school system, etc. Yet in her heart, she desires to be a godly wife and mother. I believe these are compatible.
To date, God has not revealed such apparent gifts in our second daughter. So we seek to be faithful to what He has given as we pursue further education.
Again, thank you for the encouragement. I will continue reading posts and blogs to help me and my daughters grow in our roles as help mates.
In addition, I look forward to reading Passionate Housewives Desperate for God.
By: Cheryl on September 4, 2008
at 11:43 pm